Skip to main content

MultiScale Material Science for Energy and Environment

Logo MultiScale Material Science

MultiScale Materials Science for Energy and Environment

  • Home
  • The Lab
  • People
  • Publications
  • News / Events
  • GDRI
  • Home
  • The Lab
    • The Lab
    • Research
    • Education
    • Amazing People
    • Contact
  • People
  • Publications
  • News / Events
    • News
    • Seminars
    • Conferences
    • Winter School
  • GDRI
    • Presentation

Comparison of computational water models for simulation of calcium-silicate-hydrate

TitleComparison of computational water models for simulation of calcium-silicate-hydrate
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsJi Q, Pellenq RJean-Marc, Van Vliet KJ
JournalComputational Materials Science
Volume53
Issue1
Pagination234-240
Date PublishedFeb-2012
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0927-0256
KeywordsC-S-H, Cement, Simulation, Water model
Abstract

Calcium silicate hydrate, or C-S-H, is the chief hydration product of Portland cement. The structure of the C-S-H phase within cement has been proposed and developed via molecular simulations. In such simulations, empirical interatomic potentials for water molecules within C-S-H are adopted to govern the position and relative motion of this key constituent. Initial simulations and force fields of C-S-H have assumed the simplest molecular model of H2O termed ``single point charge{''} or SPC, but this choice has not been validated by comparison with other computational models of water that confer additional bond flexibility or charge distribution. To enable efficiently computational modeling of C-S-H and to explore the role that H2O plays in maintaining C-S-H structure and properties, the choice of an efficient and accurate water model is critical. Here, we consider five distinct, classical atomistic water models (SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP4P05, and TIP5P) to determine the effects of these computational simplifications on C-S-H properties. Quantitative comparison of all five water models shows that the appropriate water model depends on the C-S-H characteristics of interest. Among these models, both SPC and TIP5P models successfully predict key properties of the structure and elastic constants of C-S-H, as well as the dynamics of water molecules within C-S-H. (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Schematics of (a) five water models and (b) calcium–silicate–hydrate (C–S–H) ...

Comparison of C–S–H structural characteristics. (a) Unit cell dimensions, where ...

Comparison of C–S–H dynamic characteristics. (a) Infrared absorption spectrum ...

Comparison of C–S–H elastic properties. (a) Elastic constants and the relative ...

DOI10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.024
  • DOI
  • BibTex
  • RIS

Login using Touchstone
  • MIT
  • CNRS
  • INVESTISSEMENT D'AVENIR
  • CINAM
  • MITEI
  • AMU