Skip to main content

MultiScale Material Science for Energy and Environment

Logo MultiScale Material Science

MultiScale Materials Science for Energy and Environment

  • Home
  • The Lab
  • People
  • Publications
  • News / Events
  • GDRI
  • Home
  • The Lab
    • The Lab
    • Research
    • Education
    • Amazing People
    • Contact
  • People
  • Publications
  • News / Events
    • News
    • Seminars
    • Conferences
    • Winter School
  • GDRI
    • Presentation

Crystal-chemistry control of the mechanical properties of 2:1 clay minerals

TitleCrystal-chemistry control of the mechanical properties of 2:1 clay minerals
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsBerthonneau J, Hoover CG, Grauby O, Baronnet A, Pellenq RJean-Marc, Ulm F-J
JournalApplied Clay Science
Volume143
Pagination387 - 398
Date PublishedJul-2017
ISSN01691317
Abstract

Clay minerals are the main constituents of the clay matrix of a wide variety of sedimentary deposits. When subjected to burial, some of these minerals undergo phase transitions accompanied by atomic substitutions which ultimately impact the cohesive interactions between their constitutive layers. The most common among such transitions is smectite illitization, which is also highly relevant for oil and gas exploration and production from source rocks. The impact of this transition on the mechanical properties of clay minerals as well as clay bearing rocks remains, however, to be properly addressed. To this end, a set of macroscopic single 2:1 clay minerals (pyrophyllite, talc, vermiculite, phlogopite, muscovite, and clintonite) representative of the two octahedral fillings and the variation in surface charge densities was investigated. A hybrid experimental-modeling approach is proposed, which combines nanoindentation in orthogonal directions (x1 and x3-directions) with analytical derivations of the cohesive energy (Ui) using XRD and TEM-EDS measurements. The results highlight that the interlayer energy defines the elasticity (modulus M), strength (hardness H) and ductility behavior (M/H) of these materials; and not the bond energy stored into the constituent layers. This finding permits the derivation of predictive stiffness and strength functional relations as derivatives of the interlayer energy that account for the arrangement of nanoscale layers and the interlayer composition. These relations suggest that as the cohesion increases with the coulombic interactions through progressive smectite illitization, the system loses its capacity to dissipate applied energy by dislocation mechanisms in between the layers, entailing an increase in brittleness of the clay particles with burial. By way of conclusion, the geophysics and geochemistry implications of these results for predicting the macroscopic mechanical performance of clay bearing geomaterials, such as economically valuable source rocks, are discussed.

DOI10.1016/j.clay.2017.04.010
Short TitleApplied Clay Science
  • DOI
  • BibTex
  • RIS

Login using Touchstone
  • MIT
  • CNRS
  • INVESTISSEMENT D'AVENIR
  • CINAM
  • MITEI
  • AMU